User talk:Kurtnardone

Welcome!

Hello Kurtnardone, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. You also might want to consider being "adopted" by an experienced user who would show you how wikipedia works through a program called adopt-a-user. Cntras (talk) 05:44, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kenny Tick Salcido

The article Kenny Tick Salcido has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 05:12, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Kenny Tick Salcido

Hello, Kurtnardone, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenny Tick Salcido whether the article Kenny Tick Salcido should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Kenny Tick Salcido, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! reddogsix (talk) 19:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:32, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Latch Brothers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Latch Brothers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Latch Brothers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome (talk) 23:05, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Hiya!

Hi! I noticed that you're pretty new here, so I thought I'd give you a little info on stuff. It's incredibly easy to go without noticing some of the policies here and very easy to get confused on all of this. I've recommended that one of the articles you've written get userfied (WP:USERFY). This means that while the page itself will be deleted off of the mainspace, you'll get to keep a copy of it in your userspace (it's sort of like a sandbox that isn't on the mainspace) to work on until it's ready.

One of the biggies here is reliable sourcing per WP:RS. Reliable sources are considered to be articles about the subject that's written by third parties that aren't involved with the subject at all. For example, if MTV did a review of TLB it would be considered to be reliable since MTV isn't actually involved in the production of the group. However listings such as a Last Fm page that merely shows that a TLB band exists or shows that their albums exist is not considered to be a reliable source. It's trivial at best, and generally the links to sites along those lines should be left off of the articles. Last Fm is more of a "buy this album/band" type of page, so those don't show notability and aren't really good to add to articles. It's about the equivalent of listing an Amazon page. Also, be aware that fan sites aren't considered to be reliable sources except in very, very rare circumstances. Basically the fan site would have to be so big and so notable that it's listed as a source in books, articles, and tv news spots, which generally doesn't happen much. For example, the The Leaky Cauldron fansite became so notable that it ended up becoming a leading authority on the Harry Potter series. When in doubt, ask someone to check it out to see if it's something that should be linked.

Of course anything put out by the group, their representatives, or anyone with a vested interest in the group (press releases, web sites, commercials, etc) is not considered to be a reliable source because they have something to gain from putting the group in the best light possible. Sometimes they can be listed as a source, but generally it's better to stick to third party sources. Be aware that linking to many websites doesn't show notability in and of itself. You can show many sources but it's the reliable sources that really count. The same thing applies to external links. See WP:LINKSTOAVOID to see what is to be linked and what shouldn't be linked.

Another thing I want to point out is WP:CITE. I noticed that you linked everything down in external links, so I wanted to point you towards the page that showed you how to cite sources and references. It's a pretty handy page. Finally, I highly recommend that you look into Wikipedia:WikiProject Music. It's a group that's devoted to expanding articles about music on Wikipedia. They would be an invaluable source of help as far as finding ways to properly source the article to where it could meet notability guidelines.

This is a pretty long entry, but it covers the most basic stuff. I hope this helps you out as far as explaining some of the stuff here on Wikipedia.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79