User talk:Kush Marvi

Welcome!

Hello, Kush Marvi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 12:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dwarkadhish Temple

Please read the above carefully. I removed your text because our basic policies require sources that meet our criteria at WP:RS. You also need to distinguish carefully between legend/myth and archaeological fact, in this case. Your edits were also unclear - were you discussing the temple or Dwarka? If the latter, that would belong at Dwarka. Doug Weller talk 12:57, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Date changes

Why did you change the dates? Did they not match the dates in the sources? Such dates need archaeological sources. Doug Weller talk 12:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dwarkadhish Temple, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Dwarkadhish Temple. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 13:56, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dwarkadhish temple

Excuse me, I am a true indian and I know more than you about our temples than you. So, why are you removing that true event which is mentioned in Mahabharat? Kush Marvi (talk) 14:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because we don't use our own knowledge in articles, we use sources that meet WP:RS. That's basic policy. We also don't treat religious texts as sources for history. Doug Weller talk 14:10, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Your recent editing history at Dwarkadhish Temple shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 14:07, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dwarkadhish temple

But it's not my own knowledge. It is mentioned in the Mahabharat Kush Marvi (talk) 14:37, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then you need to find an academic source discussing what the Mahabharat says and cite it properly. And stop writing about it as though it had happened. Post what you want to say, with sources, on the talk page and perhaps someone can help you with the English. But please don't re-insert it again, you are at 3 reverts in the last 24 hours and a 4th one will get you blocked. Even though you are adding material that I or someone else deleted, it still counts as a revert. There are videos at this link that will help you with a citation. Wikipedia:Meetup/UMassAmherst/Intro to Wikipedia. The Mahabharat itself is what we call a primary source and you really need a source discussing it. Doug Weller talk 19:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]