User talk:KyleKashuvForGAStatus

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 11:03, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Doug Weller talk 11:05, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm MrX. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Kyle Kashuv, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Only reliable sources can be used for biographies of living persons. That means reputable news organizations, magazines, journals and books. Please ask if you are having difficulty identifying reliable sources. - Mr X 🖋 22:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kyle Kashuv. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bishonen | talk 22:53, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, in view of your username and the note on your userpage, whose sock are you, please? Bishonen | talk 22:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

I'm nobody's sock. --KyleKashuvForGAStatus (talk) 01:32, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 01:37, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 01:41, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask Bishonen's question again: whose sock are you, please? Acroterion (talk) 01:43, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Acroterion: I'm NOBODY'S SOCK OR FRIEND. My userpage shows I want to improve Kyle Kashuv, but idiot MrX thinks my sources are unreliable. I cant believe you and your minion buddy Bishonen brought this up. You, Bishonen, and MrX are probably pro-David Hogg and pro-Emma González fans, yet you 3 think my edits on Kyle Kashuv are disruptive and unreliable. No wonder you 3 are all the 3 stooges. SMH! --KyleKashuvForGAStatus (talk) 01:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your response confirms that there's no realistic chance that you'll stop editing disruptively: converted to an indefinite block. Acroterion (talk) 01:50, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: And your just a supporter of these so-called sanctions. It's time to make Wikipedia great again and it starts by banning corrupted people like you and your minions MrX and Bishonen. --KyleKashuvForGAStatus (talk) 01:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And @Acroterion: keep kissing David Hogg and Emma Gonzalez like their your besties. Emma's article looks like a great article, yet Kyle Kashuv has unreliable sources according to dumbass MrX. My rant below shows how stupid the BLP policies are. --KyleKashuvForGAStatus (talk) 01:54, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RANT about stupid BLP policies

Hey Wikipedia, these BLP policies are a joke. These so-called sanctions are a joke too. MrX, Bishonen, and Acroterion are all puppets/minions of the so-called discretionary sanctions and the idiot who planned these sanctions in the first place. I don't care if I get blocked indefinitely, but ITS TIME TO MAKE WIKIPEDIA GREAT AGAIN and screw these BLP policies. Thank you! --KyleKashuvForGAStatus (talk) 01:50, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Acroterion (talk) 01:54, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: Stay classy bigot. Keep loving David Hogg and Emma Gonzalez. I CALL BS on you blocking me. --KyleKashuvForGAStatus (talk) 01:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]