User talk:LaSombra1990

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 11:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

Your recent editing history at A.I. Artificial Intelligence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 11:48, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Tim Burton, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Binksternet (talk) 05:17, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UnBlock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LaSombra1990 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What's wrong? Only because I insult others is a reason for block me? If something serves I'm sorry but please why the other users are screwing me? Please unblock me, the other users neither act well. --LaSombra1990 (talk) 04:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In addition to calling another editor a "son of a whore", you are apparently blocked for checkuser-verified abuse of multiple accounts - and you have not addressed that in your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:38, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The multiple accounts is only a suspect by you, if don't addresed that I thought it wasn't important. By the other way if I said "Son of a whore" to this guy was because he screw my patience.--LaSombra1990 (talk) 22:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LaSombra1990 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not suckpuppet of nobody. My patience has a limit and I said to his guy "son of a whore" because he was made me bullying here in Wikipedia. He screw my patience, what can I do? Please unblock me. How I can edit for well in Wikipedia if the other users does me bullying? --LaSombra1990 (talk) 22:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Personal attacks aren't permitted here. See WP:NPA. Until you can convince us that you understand why your personal attack was totally inappropriate and until you can convince us you'll never again make a personal attack, you are not going to get unblocked. Yamla (talk) 23:34, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Based on your edit history alone, I am now all but certain you are the blocked vandal, VengadorJusticiero (talk · contribs). Combined with the technical evidence, you are simply not going to be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 23:39, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]