User talk:Lagrange613

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

AIG content dispute[edit]

Hey Lagrange, would you be willing to help mediate the dispute between Rjensen and myself? While we got off on the wrong foot, I'm trying to make amends, but he has no interest in working with a "PR machine".--FacultiesIntact (talk) 23:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Given that I've already expressed an opinion on the issue at hand, I'm a poor choice to mediate the dispute. You might try WP:DRN. Good luck. Lagrange613 01:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

New York links[edit]

As noted, there is consensus to pipe these links, so I certainly hope that you will conform your conduct to the consensus of the community. However, there are many editors working on this project, so others will get to it. Cheers! bd2412 T 00:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Responded at Talk:New York#Proposed action to resolve incorrect incoming links. In short, you do not have consensus as you claim. Lagrange613 01:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
I'm afraid we will have to disagree on that. I would ask that you let the links be, at least until this project is completed. It would be great if you could help out with it, actually. There are still thousands of links to fix. bd2412 T 01:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Your definition of "fix" does not match mine. But don't worry: I won't interfere with your strange, pseudopedantic crusade on pages off my Watchlist. Reverting all the links you piped as redirects to those very links would be only marginally less stupid than the piping itself. Better things to do with my time. Lagrange613 04:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Lagrange613. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)