User talk:Laplace Architecture

Hello,

I thoght I'd followed the requested changes. Could you please confirm the extra changes you request so that I can proceed. Also, thoug Laplace Architecture hired me indeed to write their page they did it so that I could be as objective as possible. They never asked me to write their page in a certain way no edit anything to sound "better". What I intend to do from now on is to add quotes from third parties to confirm the text, hoping this will help to turn it more in the way it should be for an encyclopedia.

Isaure31.34.112.212 (talk)

Avant ça, vous devez déclarer vos connections avec Laplace Architecture sur votre page d'utilisateur. Cette déclaration est obligatoire. Aussi, car c'est la Wikipédia anglaise, vos messages ici doivent être en anglais. Merci.

Before that, you must declare your connections with Laplace Architecture on your userpage. This declaration is mandatory. Also, as this is the English Wikipedia, your messages here must be in English. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

Hello,

thanks for getting back to me so quickly. And indeed I am genuinely interested in being a general contributor and editing about topics unrelated to my conflict of interest. Here is my suggested Username.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Laplace Architecture (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Isaure (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I believe this page could be of use to an encylopedic website to bring new knowledge to design and architecture world

Decline reason:

At the time this request was posted here, this account has not been blocked. But, the person behind this account has been blocked as User:Laplace Studio. Thus, I also blocked this account for WP:socking. There is one more account, without edits: User:Laplace Design. If you want to be unblocked, please make a new request and explain your editing plans, and explain your socking. You will not be unblocked if your only purpose here is to write about a company that paid you to do so. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very nuch again for your time.

You may make the required disclosure on this page for now, see WP:PAID. What topics might you edit about? How did the company come to hire you? 331dot (talk) 10:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Vanjagenije, I would still want to change username from Laplace Architecture to Ana Kassel. As I said, Laplace architecture indeed paid me to write about their agency to avoird bias and subjectivity. I confirm that I have never tried to hide this but have evidently failed to report it at the right place. Also, I would like to add more sources to the current text so that Laplace page can reach more objectivity and more relevance. I hope this will help moving forward and hope I hear back from you soon. Regards, Ana Kassel~~~ Laplace Architecture (talk) 14:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will not be unblocked to write about Laplace Architecture because of the WP:COI (COI editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia). If your only purpose is to make COI edits, there is no way we can unblock you regardless of your username. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid contribution disclosure

Hello,

I confirm that I have been paid by Laplace Architecture for their wikipedia pages (Laplace Studio, Laplace Architecture and Laplace Design). Laplace Architecture asked a third party (me) to make sure their page would be as objective as possible and would bring interesting aka encyclopedic content to the architecture and design world.

Please do confirm if this is enough as I don't seem to be able to find where exactly to place on wikipedia pages. Thank you very much for your time.

IsaureLaplace Architecture (talk)

Hello Drm310,

thank you for getting back to me. I thought I had already mentionned it but indeed I confirm I have been commissioned by Laplace architecture to write their wikipidia pages. By using a third party they believed and hoped the page would not suffer from any potential subjectivity. I am here to write as objectively as possible, and as it should be in an encylcopedic reference book. Please do tell me where to insert this note as I don't seem to be able to find it. Kind regards,

IsaureLaplace Architecture (talk) 14:10, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. Before you begin any writing about these companies, I would advise you to review the notability criteria for companies and organizations. A company is not allowed to have an article just because the company exists. To merit an article, it must have already received significant coverage from multiple sources that Wikipedia deems to be both reliable and independent of the company itself.

What sources do you have to demonstrate that this company is notable? Because this is English Wikipedia, English-language sources are preferred. However, French-language (actually, any language) sources are acceptable if they are also reliable and independent.

I would also advise you to use the WP:Article wizard as a means to create your draft article(s). It's a useful guide for someone who is new to creating articles. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Drm310,

the company (coming under three different labels : Laplace Studio, Laplace Architecture, Laplace Design) has had many press en references coverage. The list is long, reputable and of impeccable sources. I had added all the sources which I thought was there to prove the importance of Laplace (TSudio/Design/Architecture) in the design and architecture world. Do tell me if this could "suffice" to start over their page. Thank you,

Isaure

I think there may be some confusion here. Your only edits on English Wikipedia have been to this page. Any content you've written about Laplace so far has been in your draft article on French Wikipedia, (fr:Utilisateur:Laplace Architecture/Brouillon). Please note that each language version of Wikipedia is considered a separate project. If you have issues or questions with your edits on French Wikipedia, you will have to engage editors there.

Your draft on French Wikipedia has an exhaustive list of sources, but they're all in a huge list at the end of the article. Wikipedia articles use inline citations to help readers verify the content. Help:Footnotes has instructions on how to use these on English Wikipedia. fr:Aide:Note is the corresponding equivalent on French Wikipedia, and the page fr:Wikipédia:Citez vos sources may also help you.

If you want to create an English version of these articles, please try using the Article Wizard link I mentioned above. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:03, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drm310: I think the user may be on about Special:Contributions/Laplace Studio. Lavalizard101 (talk) 17:07, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Drm310,

I see what you mean. There are features and ciatations and articles in english and I could easily refer to those indeed. As for the french version, yes I am in contact with a Wiki french editor too. Should I then start with adding references? Thank you again for your help,

IsaureLaplace Architecture (talk) 17:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Vanjagenije,

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Laplace Architecture (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wish to be unblocked as I do not believe my reasons are illegitimate or not intentionnaly at least. I would like to create two pages for Laplace one being Laplace Architecture and the othe one being Laplace Design as these are two separate entities of Laplace Studio. I have stated from the start that I had indeed received payment for the writing but only as Laplace Studio wanted to get someone external to their agency so that they could be as objective as can be. I hope you will unblock my username and allow me to carry on with the Laplace pages writing. Thanks a lot in advance for your time and help. Isaure Laplace Architecture (talk) 12:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC) ]] 15:41, 4 April 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked to write articles which are in your conflict of interest. If that is your only goal, then this is the end of the line. If you want to write about other topics, not in your conflict of interest, then in your next unblock request, tell us what they are. PhilKnight (talk) 16:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.