User talk:LifeStar
Please direct your messages to the proper section. All CVU/anti-vandalism messages can be placed at the bottom of this page.
Thank you so much.
[edit]Dear Lifestar, Thank yo so much for defending my user page against the vandalism. Much appreciated. --Cyril Thomas 21:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Message from anon ip
[edit]Can you give some sort of explanation for denying me access to my user talk page? I prefer to keep my messages archived in the history. --70.109.193.53 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Response is on 70.109.193.53's talk page.--LifeStar 20:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. You say that I can provide a direct link to archived messages. Please unprotect my talk page so that I may do this. You are really splitting hairs by suggesting that it is not my talk page. While I do not "own" my IP address ("own" is your word, by the way, not mine) it is used solely by me. My talk page would be used to communicate only with me. I would certainly like to continue contributing to Wikipedia, but I choose to do so as an unregistered user. I am willing to put up with greater scrutiny, I just ask that I am not denied access to my one little, tiny corner of Wikipedia - MY talk page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.109.193.53 (talk) 01:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
- You're right, sorry. I looked at the page history too quickly and it looked like you had protected to page. Thank you for the links. Here is something you seem to need a refresher on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.109.193.53 (talk) 10:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
- Thanks for the response. You say that I can provide a direct link to archived messages. Please unprotect my talk page so that I may do this. You are really splitting hairs by suggesting that it is not my talk page. While I do not "own" my IP address ("own" is your word, by the way, not mine) it is used solely by me. My talk page would be used to communicate only with me. I would certainly like to continue contributing to Wikipedia, but I choose to do so as an unregistered user. I am willing to put up with greater scrutiny, I just ask that I am not denied access to my one little, tiny corner of Wikipedia - MY talk page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.109.193.53 (talk) 01:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Alma FEAR.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Alma FEAR.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)