User talk:Liptonicetea

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Abraham Lincoln (sex act). Your test worked, and has been or will soon be removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. RandyWang (^{chat me up}/_{fix me up}) 02:46, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe the act is a real one, please provide some references that demonstrate both it's existence, and it's significance as a sexual act. Both of those are required before it can be considered for inclusion. RandyWang (^{chat me up}/_{fix me up}) 02:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. RandyWang (^{chat me up}/_{fix me up}) 02:57, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While the thought of stills or videos of such an act as evidence is, well.. interesting... I'm going to have to decline your generous offer of porn. Aside from the danger that my girlfriend would be less than impressed, there's also the fact that such evidence is not sufficient for inclusion in the encyclopedia anyway: you need to provide documentation from a notable third party, like a newspaper or widely-circulated magazine, that demonstrates both that it's a common act, and that it has cultural significance. RandyWang (^{chat me up}/_{fix me up}) 03:02, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Your article was deleted because it did not meet Wikipedia's requirements for inclusion: namely, verifiability and significance. If you do not believe it should at been deleted, please lodge a request for recreation at WP:DRV rather than simply attacking other users. RandyWang (^{chat me up}/_{fix me up}) 03:12, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block Notice

Your account has been blocked for 48 hours for vicious personal attacks and vandalistic jokes. Please read our policies and guidelines during your block, and do not edit unless you do so constructively. Best wishes, Xoloz 03:19, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]