User talk:Lisaconnick

This is Lisaconnick's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

May 2020[edit]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Alfredo Bowman. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 17:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Who said it my point of view?? The comments I added are facts that are written in court records in both the Central District court and Los Angeles county courts. Just because you don’t know about these facts doesn’t mean it’s my point of view. I couldn’t publish the case link because pacers didn’t allow it. But I promise to mention your name in my article that you disputed the fact as a personal point of view. Get your shit straight before you try to correct someone. Lisaconnick (talk) 16:29, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TheImaCow. I noticed that in this edit to User:Bonadea, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheImaCow (talk) 16:36, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Bonadea, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TheImaCow (talk) 16:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Bonadea, you may be blocked from editing. TheImaCow (talk) 16:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There’s no supporting facts for her background information and her behavior makes it questionable. She deleted a contribution I made in Alfredo Bowman’s bio without researching the judicial facts I stated. Therefore her background is questionable. Don’t restore it until she attach a link of proof. Lisaconnick (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been more constructive for you to ask why I reverted your edits, rather than to start vandalising my user page. In case it is not clear, a Wikipedia user page is not an encyclopedia article and requires no sources. I provided a rationale when reverting your edits, but I am happy to explain further. Your two edits here added various pieces of information that is not in the source here – for instance, your edits mention a name of a person who is not mentioned in the source. You also use non-neutral phrasing such as "...but those who know the truth are aware that [...] got too close for comfort" – Wikipedia can never make that kind of evaluative statement in its own voice, even if a source should say it. (And again, the source said nothing about it). It was a coincidence that I happened to be the first person to notice your edits; any editor aware of the policies concerning a neutral point of view and verifiability would have done the same thing.

What you need to do if you want to contest the removal of your edits is to go to the article's talk page (Talk:Alfredo Bowman) and present the information and your sources for that information there. Wikipedia does not expect its readers to have to look up the verification themselves – it has to be present in the article, in the form of reliable secondary sources. For that reason, the onus is on you, when you want to add contested information, to provide the sources for the changes you want to make. I hope this makes sense. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 17:16, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Bonadea. Serols (talk) 16:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read the reason I deleted the user. Lisaconnick (talk) 16:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 18:54, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection[edit]

Hi Lisaconnick, and thank you for your message. If you want to request that an article or another page at Wikipedia should be protected, go to the page Wikipedia:Requests for page protection and follow the instructions there. The instructions are (hopefully) pretty clear, but feel free to ask for assistance, either by me or at the Wikipedia Teahouse. (The Teahouse is frequented by friendly, experienced editors who answer all kinds of questions about editing Wikipedia. It might be a better place to ask if you want a quick response, especially since I am going to sign off for the night now.) Best regards, --21:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Bonadea (talk • contribs)