User talk:Littleoldmanandball

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Littleoldmanandball (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why I edited Jesus(as) in Islam First of all in Islam jesus(AS) is NOT THE son of God so stuff like "You are my son and my beloved......" under Jesus(as) tracing the characters of light should not be there secondly casting out demons is a miracle that I have not read in the Quran and it appears to be from a christian source reference 12 and so i removed that also ahmedi's are non-muslims because they don't believe that Prophet Muhammad (saw) is the last prophet and so their view should be on a different page there is also some confusing text under the heading of theology and a picture showing a river where Jesus was said to be baptized which has no source nor is it confirmed on the page whether or not such a concept exsists in Islam so if it does not then please remove the pic. The heading of preaching also gives no sources and the text under the heading of theology gives a confusing view using the old testament to make a distinction also surah al baqrah verse 87 says: "And We did certainly give Moses the Torah and followed up after him with messengers. And We gave Jesus, the son of Mary, clear proofs and supported him with the Pure Spirit. But is it [not] that every time a messenger came to you, [O Children of Israel], with what your souls did not desire, you were arrogant? And a party [of messengers] you denied and another party you killed." i dont think it says that he was filled with the holy spirit but supported by it so if you are right about him being filled with it then please give another reference form the Quran or another reliable source. Also under the heading of preaching there is information with no source given which appears to be biblical information and so it is not fit to be there as of yet please get it verified also there is a heading foreknowledge i don't understand that one well so if you can fix all of this soon i will be gratefull for now i am reverting it please don't mind.

Decline reason:

Not a valid unblock request. Further abuse of the unblock template will result in talk page access being revoked.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)}}[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jesus in Islam without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jesus in Islam, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 04:15, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To reinforce this, continued deletion of material without explanation will probably result in blocks. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Jesus in Islam, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 04:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sro23 (talk) 04:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You need to wait for others to reply to your post. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:42, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked as an illegitimate sockpuppet of User:Obaidullah_ak. You need to appeal the block under your original account, Obaidullah_ak. Until then, you are not welcome here no matter what account or IP address you use. You, as a person, are not allowed to edit while the block on your original account remains in place.

If you think this is a mistake, you can appeal this block by reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

Ian.thomson (talk) 04:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]