This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ljleppan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi, I noticed that you removed the branch and rank insignia from the infobox of Annukka Ylivaara. Any particular reason? Some articles on military people have them, some don't, but I'm not aware of a policy for or against. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi DoubleGrazing, see MOS:INFOBOXFLAG (Avoid flag icons in infoboxes. Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field. [..] Flag icons should only be inserted in infoboxes in those cases where they convey information in addition to the text.) and MOS:ICONDECORATION (Icons should serve an encyclopedic purpose and not merely be decorative. [..] An icon is purely decorative if it does not improve comprehension of the article subject and serves no navigational function. As far as I can see, the icons I removed did not provide any additional information not already available in a more digestible form from the associated text. Ljleppan (talk) 10:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. I thought military people might have been an exception to this 'no icons in infobox' rule, because you do see them used quite often (then again, quite often you don't...), but perhaps not. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
The rules are somewhat vague ("avoid", "generally", etc.), and a lot of military infoboxes fall into cases where flags are useful: for example in Battle of the Bulge the flags are useful for associating nationalities to entries in a larger list. There's also a ton of older military articles that are just filled with all kinds of flags and icons that are purely decorational, and nobody has just got around to them (or cared enough) to fix them. Ljleppan (talk) 11:02, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's discussion board.
Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk·contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello! It took me a little while, but I finally revisited autocracy and fixed or replied to the comments in your review. I wanted to thank you again for your review and let you know I've renominated it, just in case you wanted to pick up where we left off. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi! Good to see you are editing again. I'm rather busy with work for a few more days, but if nobody has picked up the review by the weekend, I'll see if I can find the time to wrap it up myself. Ljleppan (talk) 08:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between January and March 2024. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 04:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
