User talk:Llewcellist

On talk pages and AfD discussions, please sign

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 04:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Misha Quint

The notability guidelines for musicians are at WP:MUSIC. Please see my comment on the AfD page also: I think there's currently enough notability to keep the article around, but I think independent reliable sources need to be found to back up the claims. —C.Fred (talk) 04:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Micha Quint

The article in question was brought to my attention from a bot generated list of articles that may have conflicts of interests. Since the content was a copy-and-paste it appears to be a copyright violation, furthermore even with permission the problem remains that it is written with a particular point of view in mind and is not referenced with reliable sources nor does the article establish or claim notability; particularly WP:Music. Just because this artist is mentioned on a list of musicians on another Wikipedia article does not make him notable enough for an article nor even inclusion on said list. As for the tone of the article it full of irrelevant information and is drawn out, it remains largely uncited, does not state notability, is not written like most musician's articles, clearly shows that this is just an ordinary man, and is written sophmorically. The other articles are poor examples and I have tagged them as unreferenced and questionably notable. The guidelines are WP:Music and WP:N. Permession of not you should reference the material not copy it.Troyster87 (talk) 06:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thanks. I will be rewriting it within the next few days. I am also working on digging up the other sources.--Llewcellist (talk) 03:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Caitlin Hulcup

These are the changes I made to the article. Please see also Talk:Caitlin Hulcup for further information about the sources you used. As pointed out above, if you have any connection whatsoever (personal or professional) with InterHarmony International Music Festival you need to read WP:Conflict of interest and scrupulously follow the guidance there. Voceditenore (talk) 14:36, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Christa Mayer

These are the changes I made to the article. It still needs a lot of clean-up and much better sourcing. Voceditenore (talk) 14:57, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Misha Quint, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Founder. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: InterHarmony International School of Music Online has been accepted

InterHarmony International School of Music Online, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 19:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]