User talk:Lucemerka

Hello Lucemerka. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Teleperformance, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lucemerka. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lucemerka|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --VViking_TalkEdits 17:51, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Viewmont Viking I am not being compensate for the changes made. I do work for Teleperformance but I published them because I saw this project on Instagran and it is really good. I have used the apple page as a reference in order to not do anything wrong (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple). The map is informative and so are the images. Please let me know what should I do in oder to comply with the rules. I do believe that projects like COTW in Colombia are a good example of the company corporate initiatives and are a good reference. I will wait for your guidance and sorry If I did anything wrong.

You may not be compensated directly for making changes but you do have a Conflict of Interest since you work there. Please review the COI policy section. Your link is from the Portuguese version of Wikipedia, also see Other Things exist. Apple is a much larger and more well known company than Teleperformance and the article in the english version is more neutral in tone, longer and therefore can include additional information without it being as promotional or inappropriate for the page. Thank you for taking the time to respond and not just edit warring. But please remember the COI policies as well.--VViking_TalkEdits 17:35, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi I understand your point. I will review the COI policy and think what can be a good information for the users and not the company. :) Maybe the logo evolution is something good to include. We received a message from Gbawden yesterday asking the license information of the Teleperformance offices images to pu them back. Just to double check, the images from the teleperformance´s office can´t be used even with the license or are trhey good? The CSR images and the map were consider too promotional, right. Just want to double check the offices. Thank you and sorry for making so many questions.

Please discuss the changes on the articles talk page Talk:Teleperformance. However if you have fixed the issues with the copyright for the past logos I think that would be okay to add. --VViking_TalkEdits 13:14, 20 June 2019 (UTC)