User talk:Lucie.barhon

Addenbrooke's cognitive examination[edit]

I have moved Addenbrooke's cognitive examination to Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, and I put a link to it in the disambiguation page ACE. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sydney Language Battery (SYDBAT) (September 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more context on how this helps identify Primary Progressive Aphasia. Is this the primary method they are using, or is this some new tool that they are trying out. Is the test administered in English or can it apply to multiple languages?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sydney Language Battery (SYDBAT) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sydney Language Battery (SYDBAT), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:41, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sydney Language Battery (SYDBAT)[edit]

Hello, Lucie.barhon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sydney Language Battery".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 19:24, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cambridge Behavioural Inventory has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cambridge Behavioural Inventory. Thanks! Somej (talk) 23:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cambridge Behavioural Inventory has been accepted[edit]

Cambridge Behavioural Inventory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:10, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]