User talk:Luiscabrillo

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Luiscabrillo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Woodym555 00:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aston Villa F.C.

Do you have a page reference for the text you added to the Aston Villa F.C. article? This helps other editors to verify the statement and make sure that it is factually accurate. See Wikipedia:Verifiability for more information. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask! Thanks and welcome. Woodym555 00:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i don't know how to reply yet so i'll do it here. i flipped thru the book but couldn't find it, will do later. he definitely said it because i was rather chuffed to say the least when i read it. great author, great character and a villa fan too! woolley that is, i reckon robinson must support bristol, poor chap.

Commercial use of Image:Hutchins.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Hutchins.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Hutchins.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Hutchins.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

prod

Emma Hutchins

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Emma Hutchins, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Arch dude 01:18, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!. I noticed that you rempoved the "prod" tag. This is perfectly acceptable, it just means that the deletion is not unopposed. I have tagged the article with a notability tag. This means that I feel that it does not meet the notability guideline. To establish notability, read WP:BIO. basically, you will need to find and cite two independent reliable sources, such widey-circulated newpapers, that discuss Emma Hutchins in a way that makes it clear that she is notable. Your current references are all published eitehr by Emma or by the theater, and therefore do no count. See WP:CITE for help, or ask me or any other editor for help. Note: you have just as much authority as I do. After awhile, if there are not sources, someone (possibly me) will nominate the article for deletion at WP:AFD as a contested deletion candidate. I thought it would be friendlier if I waited awhile to see if you can document notability first, rather than trying to do it in the middle of an AFD depate. Good Luck! -Arch dude 20:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi! she is referenced on the david tennant site, a popular doctor who site, the rogues and vagabonds site (which is not the theatre she is performing at) and elsewhere. i'm may be accused of jumping the gun somewhat but i believe she will be shortly receiving far more coverage when her play commences mid august. i'm not trying to publicise her as i've no financial interest in her career. i heard a talk she gave on acting and it enthused me and i think she's one to watch and very talented. regards!

Regarding your edits to Wishaw, Warwickshire:

Your recent edit to Wishaw, Warwickshire (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 17:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]