User talk:Luk/Archives/2009/11
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Luk. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
ArbCom Election RFC courtesy notice
A request for comment that may interest you is currently in progress at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee 2. If you have already participated, then please disregard this notice and my apologies. Manning (talk) 08:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
You received this message because you participated in the earlier ArbCom secret ballot RFC.
Re: Claude Lévi-Strauss
Bonjour,
Pourtant, j'ai vu sur Le Monde quelque part qu'il est décédé le dimanche, mais je ne retrouve plus ou :(.
On devrait obliger que les gens meurent pendant la journée ^^
Bien à vous,
YellowOnline —Preceding unsigned comment added by YellowOnline (talk • contribs) 17:24, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- Entièrement d'accord! :D Pour le moment autant laisser tel quel, ça sera bien précisé à un moment ou un autre. -- Luk talk 17:25, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- (Switching back to English. Didn't know this was public. I'm really not used to the MyTalk feature.)) Actually, I'm rather sure meanwhile it's the same article in Le Monde that is used as a reference. I do think Le Monde must've changed it because they aren't too sure about it either. In Le Figaro - I thought - was written that "no details on why and when were given" I expect details in tomorrow's newspapers. -- YellowOnline talk 18:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Queens Library IP
Special:Contributions/207.159.196.253 Can the block be a soft block? We're getting unblock requests from registered users who can't edit. Enigmamsg 20:28, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Mmm we can try that, considering the block was made in March. -- Luk talk 07:43, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Alpaca page is full of nonsense
Found this page full of all kinds of nonsense. I never "reverted" a page before, so I'm nervous to do it myself! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpaca 98.221.244.76 (talk) 02:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Replied on this user's talk page - 12:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop
As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Asia Pulp & Paper entry
Dear Luk,
It has been many months since I posted the attack page designation to the Asia Pulp & Paper (APP) entry and the request for its removal into a neutral "stub."
I appreciate that you have inserted the neutrality dispute sign on top of the article, but beyond that and some minor revisions (mostly spelling) there hasn't been much changes to the list of incorrect statements that I pointed out in my 1st posting in the Discussion page.
Respecting the procedure of Wikipedia and the inherent COI, I have not make any changes myself. Instead, I began submitting material into the Discussion page that I think should be part of a balanced and neutral encyclopedic article that Wikipedia claims to be. To start with I have provided some basic company information that revises some incorrect information in the current version. It has been 3 months since I posted that information and nothing has change in the Wikipedia APP entry.
I plan to submit additional information to balance the information in the entry, but I am concerned that this is not going to make a difference since nothing much has been revised despite the various communications I have posted in the Discussion page previously.
I would appreciate your guidance on how to resolve this. As I have mentioned before, this page has done serious reputational damage to APP and continue to be so unless it is reduced into a stub while an appropriate, encyclopedic article is developed. Wikipedia is trusted by many as an accurate and neutral source of information in the internet, and I hope this vision is upheld in the entry regarding APP.
Thank you for you attention Dewi bramono (talk) 03:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC)