User talk:Luluaanderson

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Reilly, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Reilly with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Reilly, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Reilly was changed by Luluaanderson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864705 on 2016-02-06T03:40:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Tryadon (talk) 03:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. m.o.p 03:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]