User talk:Lunartsbr

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw your changes to Questverse, and I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Lunartsbr", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website. Please note that Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or appear to be shared by multiple people. Please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. CtP (t • c) 00:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Questverse for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Questverse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Questverse until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CtP (t • c) 00:17, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Questverse

Thanks for creating Questverse, Lunartsbr!

Wikipedia editor Theopolisme has tagged the page as having some issues to fix. In addition, they wrote this note for you:

Hi - I enjoyed your article, but you may want to add more 3rd party sources. Thanks!

The tags on the page can be removed by you or another editor when the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on Theopolisme's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

August 2012

Lunartsbr is just a component of my e-mail(lunartsbr@gmail.com), the lunarts part of it is also my artistic pseudonym since months ago, br was added to the e-mail because lunarts one was already taken. If it was 'Lunarts-Studio', it would represent the name I take for my productions, but I'm using lunartsbr, I almost never user my real name, artists are used to use pseudonyms. I intended to give the starting step on the game wikipedia page, being the most neutral possible; since wikipedia has always been to me a good source of information for years, I wanted my project to too be part of this very usefull web encyclopedia. I'm used to post a skeleton article, and improve it with several edits right after the posting until it looks fine for everyone else; it didn't passed even 1 hour for my article to be marked for deletion and issues being pointed for my username, excuse me?

Anyway I will keeping editing the article so it stays the most neutral and good looking I manage it to be. Let me know if there are any issues beside the two already mentioned. Lunartsbr (talk) 00:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Questverse

The article Questverse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article describes a product that does not exist: it is "being developed" and various platforms are "planned".

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seduisant (talk) 02:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have been reading your links, yes, I agree with the deletion

I have been reading the links about deletion guidelines you sent me, and your discussion about this specific article; if what I understood is right, then yes, you can delete the article. I guess I agree since now I know a couple of things I didn't before about how exactly wikipedia works.

I'm still confused about what is considered to be notable, it must show on google news only? As browsing on google 'regular search' you would had seen a lot of data(images, videos and such) about this project, such as the following from the many sites.

http://www.diygamer.com/2012/04/anime-ted-first-questverse-details-outlined/

http://www.indiegamemag.com/anime-ted-first-questverse-details-outlined/#.UCKGjSNMilg

http://www.lunarts-studio.com.br/questverse.php

http://www.indiedb.com/games/questverse

http://www.moddb.com/games/questverse

The last warning said something about a product which does not exist, if by not exist you mean under development but with content already present; then yes; otherwise that afirmation is wrong. I would also like to know if a deleted article from someone which didn't intended to offend anyone affects his/her status on wikipedia and around?

I would be gratefull if after deletion I could get some explanations from one of you about the above(will be easier to understand than the documentation I hope), may I request at least that personal clarification?

Lunartsbr (talk) 03:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Depending on the reason for deletion, other links

http://linuxgamecast.com/2012/08/questverse-fundraising-campaign/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWPn9AHnPN4&feature=g-all-u

http://linuxgamingnews.org/2012/08/09/questverse-on-indiegogo-freed-if-funded/

It will also be feature on IndieDB as featured article soon, I already contacted and obtained of Traeget, its editor for that. The project is also usually 700< popularity on IndieDB; the best position in indieDb is 1, the worst 7680.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Questverse has been reverted.
Your edit here to Questverse was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWPn9AHnPN4&feature=g-all-u) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:17, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry in advance if the issue is exactly the game not being finished(not lack of news, popularity or media as images/videos and musics)

Mistake me not with the other attempts of other people on wikipedia whose game didn't had references to back them up. After the links above are looked at carefully, if the issue is really 'The game had news to prove it, had media like images/videos and music, had some popularity, but we cannot let it be on wikipedia because it is yet not finished'; then know I have no grudge against any of you; I only blame me for not understanding earlier how wikipedia worked and thinking wikipedia would be a good idea. Expect to see me again in the distant future if that was the issue.