User talk:Luppy-GT

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Luppy-GT! Thank you for your contributions. I am Doug Weller and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Doug Weller (talk) 08:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amun-Re vs Amun-Ra

Sorry to do this but as the main article Precinct of Amun-Re uses the 'Re' spelling, we should stick to that until and if we get agreement at that article's talk page to change the name. I've reverted your hard work, which I hate to do but I think we need to keep consistency here. Doug Weller (talk) 08:50, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Amen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Amen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:28, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You continue to make spelling changes without discussion, and your latest ended up with a sentence that says "expressed in his fusion with the Sun god, Ra, as Amun-Ra or Amun-Ra." which makes no sense. Please stop and start discussing this on the appropriate talk pages. Doug Weller (talk) 06:58, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond

I'm not even sure now if you read English. Wikipedia is a collaborative excercise, and discussion between editors is vital. Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 07:00, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Eye of Ra with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ~ Rob^Talk 07:54, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

I don't believe you've been warned specifically, so let me try one last time to reach out to you. I encourage you to respond here or on a relevant talk page, rather than continuing to ignore people trying to help you.

Do not continue replacing Amun-Re with Amun-Ra in multiple articles. Amun-Re is an acceptable spelling of Amun-Ra, and is supported by multiple sources. In doing your edits in a somewhat automatic fashion, you've frequently created edits that do not make sense or have removed information on the Amun-Re spelling. You've also accidentally inserted "Amun-Re" in the middle of citations or changed citation titles that were spelled Amun-Re, which is incorrect. Before doing wholesale changes like this, discuss them on relevant talk pages. Even after you get consensus to make a change like this, do it carefully. There's no reason to rush and make mistakes like the above. I have no doubt that you have good intentions, but as it stands, your behavior has been somewhat disruptive. In pursuing an unsupported change of spelling like this, it's not fair to other editors or the public who uses Wikipedia to leave many mistakes behind you. Basically, my recommendation is to edit slowly and deliberately. This will save you a lot of hassle, and help you edit Wikipedia constructively.

If you have any questions or need any help, please let me know. I'm watching this page, so you can respond here. While I have every hope that you will take what I've said into consideration, please note that if you do not, it's possible that you may be blocked, as described above. ~ Rob^Talk 10:21, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Your recent editing history at Karnak shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller (talk) 10:30, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amun

The warning above now applies to this article also. Please start using talk pages to discuss your edits. Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 10:50, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Luppy-GT reported by User:Doug Weller (Result: ). Thank you. Doug Weller (talk) 11:25, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Amun

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Luppy-GT reported by User:Doug Weller (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:00, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are risking an indefinite block

Please see the further complaint about your edits at User talk:EdJohnston#User:Luppy-GT. It's been claimed that you are changing the spelling of words included in direct quotes. If true, this is an example of WP:Source falsification, which is very serious. If you continue to edit without responding to this complaint, you are likely to be indefinitely blocked per WP:NOTHERE. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:47, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Luppy-GT, it appears you falsified a direct quote here. EdJohnston (talk) 03:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]