I can be better reached on my Slovenian talk page.
- 1 June 2014
- 2 Your addition of flags to infoboxes.
- 3 Sourcing from GoogleBooks
- 4 Userbox
- 5 A pie for you!
- 6 Categories
- 7 M48
- 8 WikiProject Military history coordinator election
- 9 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 10 Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
- 11 Military history WikiProject coordinator election
- 12 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
- 13 Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!
- 14 Survey Invite
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please stop adding flags to infoboxes. Per WP:MILMOS#MOSFLAG and a longstanding consensus on articles relating to weapons etc there should be no national flags there. Thomas.W talk 18:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Your addition of flags to infoboxes.
Hello. Please read the message I posted above and stop adding flags to infoboxes on articles about weapons, cartridges etc, because it violates both Wikipedia's Manual of Style (see WP:INFOBOXFLAG, WP:MILMOS#MOSFLAG and others) and a longstanding consensus on those kinds of articles. I don't want to give you a formal warning for violating the Manual of Style, but if you don't stop, I will. Thank you. Thomas.W talk 19:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Sourcing from GoogleBooks
Hello, I just approved Mannlicher M1890 for you. In its initial state it would not have passed review since the Hungariae site appears to be a (albeit very knowledgeable) hobbyist site rather than a formal production. See WP:Reliable sources. But since I'm interested in the topic, I took 15 minutes or so and went to GoogleBooks, dug up some citations. Some of the old books literally give all the length/weight/velocity measurement data right there in black and white. I wanted to find more detail about its adoption and later displacement by the 1895, but since time is a factor I added just enough cites to put it through.
For your future drafts, ensure you try a variety of different keywords on GoogleBooks and see if you can find some authoritative works to cite. I switched it up a bit, so searched under Mannlicher M1890 as well as Mannlicher 1890, Mannlicher M90, etc. So whatever you write next, aim to get strong sources from GoogleBooks. You can instantly turn a gBooks URL into a full Wikipedia footnote with http://reftag.appspot.com . Amazing tool, huge time-saver and nice clean format.
- Oh, couple small points to consider for future articles. Once a piece publishes, check around Wikipedia for mentions of your topic that need to have a WP:wikilink added so people can come to your article for more info. I also checked Google, and found out that Polish Wikipedia has pl:Karabin Mannlicher M1890, so I linked them using the tool in the left margin, so now your article has a little link in the left margin to check out the Polish version. Just pointing out some of the settup stuff I reflexively do for new articles, good little habits to get into. Thanks again! MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll try to do my best in the future.
Hi. The page you inadvertently created in mainspace at M11rtinb/Userboxes/Austria-Hungary has been moved to User:M11rtinb/Userboxes/Austria-Hungary. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC) Thanks
A pie for you!
|Thanks for starting the Hebel Model 1894. It is nice to see some of the less known but still important firearms showing up on Wikipedia. Molestash (talk) 22:10, 8 October 2014 (UTC)|
Straight-pull bolt-action rifles should still be in the bolt-action rifles category. Really, straight-pull should be a subcategory of bolt-action. Please re-add bolt-action for the straight-pull rifles. Faceless Enemy (talk) 13:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- The Category:Straight-pull rifles is already a subcategory of Category:Bolt-action rifles, and by changing the Bolt-action category to Straight-pull rifles category I just make the clarification more precise. These articles are still in the Bolt-action category. M11rtinb (talk) 13:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not trying to be difficult. I should have been more specific. The SA (the non-Nazi force of Germany at the time) for example used the M48 and were not Nazis.MartinezMD (talk) 04:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, wasn't the SA the Nazi Party's own paramilitary organization at the time of adoption of the rifle? And you probably meant that they used the K98k, not the M48. M11rtinb (talk) 04:52, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry I meant the Wehrmacht. I'm not writing my thoughts clearly today (I was thinking the SA and SS were the Nazis but not necessarily the regular uniformed forces). And yes, the K98. I had the M48 article in my head. The early designs started long before the Nazis came to power, and the redesign order came later in 1935. I'm not looking to be contentious on the issue.MartinezMD (talk) 05:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.