User talk:MDMCK10

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Bob Pony. 331dot (talk) 15:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. 331dot (talk) 16:00, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #62556

is open. Courtesy notification @Widr: -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring TPA so they can request unblocking here. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is closed with appeal to be made here. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MDMCK10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(Note: English second language, this might read weird and I apologize for that in advance) Back in 2016 I did not fully understand what I was getting myself into by recreating deleted pages and attacking other editors, however, since than a lot of time has gone by, and I have learned that such behavior is not acceptable at all, and if unblocked, I promise to not do such things again in the future. If more information is needed, feel free to ask me in a reply, I have also included more information in UTRS2 appeal #62556. I am hoping that I can be given a second chance. MDMCK10 (talk) 16:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Per below. Widr (talk) 21:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: - what are your thoughts about a possible unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 17:02, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I support, but I just restored TPA. The UTRS request was good enough to bring here, but I tend to be easy. 'Twas @Widr: wot did the original blocking. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. @Widr: - what do you think? PhilKnight (talk) 17:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, MDMCK10. You promise to not do such things again in the future. What will you do instead if unblocked? Widr (talk) 17:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to be honest here, I did not actually plan ahead far enough in terms of what edits I want to make if unblocked, but for when I do finally decide to edit something (not sure when or what, got a lot of real life things going on at the moment, so my free time is somewhat limited), I will be sure to follow the guidelines, and also act on any (negative) feedback regarding said edits (such as reverts, talk page messages, etc) in a more civil manner than how I did back in 2016. I hope this answers your question well enough, and if not, feel free to explain why it doesn't, or ask about it in a more specific way (I don't always manage to fully understand questions the first time, especially such open-ended ones as this). MDMCK10 (talk) 17:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would have probably unblocked you myself if I had seen a well-prepared, thoughful appeal, describing how unblocking you would help Wikipedia, or maybe a list of some articles you'd like to edit. Instead, after being blocked for six years, you now want to get unblocked even though you are short of time and don't really have concrete plans to edit here. I know I'm a sourpuss, but I can't support this time. That said, I won't object either if Deepfriedokra, PhilKnight or others find your appeal convincing enough. Widr (talk) 19:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can totally understand your stance on this, although I'm also not completely sure if I'm explaining things properly, what I mean is that when I do things (in general, not just in relation to Wikipedia), I do things on a whim/as they come to mind, not in any sort of preplanned way. So for example, in the case of Wikipedia it would mean that instead of me exactly knowing what I want to edit and how I want to edit it ahead of time, If I see/come across/just so happen to be reading something that I personally think I could edit/add information to in a way that can be considered useful, I would just do it right there and then.

In short, I'm awful at planning things in advance, It's just how I am and I don't know if there is much I can do about it. MDMCK10 (talk) 20:45, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, this reply sounds reasonable enough for unblocking, so I will do it myself now. I trust that you have matured in six years and won't make a mess this time. Good luck! Widr (talk) 20:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, appreciate it! MDMCK10 (talk) 21:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Email

I have read your email, and replied to it. JBW (talk) 16:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]