Jump to content

User talk:MIgartua

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion of Dondehood

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dondehood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ju66l3r (talk) 19:47, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Delasónica

[edit]

Hi MIgartua, thanks for your Email. Yes I deleted Delasónica as the article about them had been tagged as having failed our policy wp:band as there was no assertion of notability. I don't know if the Delasónica that our article was about is the same as the Delasónica you emailed me about, but if having read wp:band you think they would meet that policy and are willing to edit the article accordingly I'd be delighted to undelete the article for you. WereSpielChequers 08:40, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Affiliate marketing ‎ . Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Kuru talk 12:21, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]