User talk:MOASPN

Musings of a Semi Private Nature (MOASPN) is a Legitimate multiple account created because I wish to "avoid conflicts about a particular area of interest turning into conflicts based upon user identity and personal attacks elsewhere, or to avoid harassment outside of Wikipedia." I "do not use any other account to edit the same subject or make it appear that multiple people support the same action."

I will reveal my main account to individuals who I deem in my sole discression responsible and respectful of privacy concerns. MOASPN 02:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was well said[edit]

Reading your last post at WT:BADLINKS, I hope I didn't enflame anything at the criticism article - the response to my action indicates that I was taken by some to be continuing what JzG started. I was actually ignoring him and trying to start (or maybe R) a BRD, but in context I guess it was apt to be taken wrong. -GTBacchus^(talk) 03:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again[edit]

Hi Musings,

I don't think the problem with your previous account is any uncertainty over your contributions. It's perhaps more that you've chosen a name that people could confuse with mine, or that you're making a point with your username, which I'm afraid isn't allowed.

You're more than welcome to use my userpage (you're probably all up to speed on the licensing stuff anyway), but could you change your name to one less likely to confuse? Thanks. Privatemusings 23:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To illustrate (because this is the third account now!), the usernames 'A_Davidy_Gerard', 'aVirginwhoisSlim' or 'aWhalecalledJimbo' would all be unsuitable (and rubbish) as dodgy derivatives. Privatemusings 21:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MOASPN is not. MOASPN 21:55, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you could be right, and if someone went for 'aVwiS', spelling out the acronym on their user page, then that would be acceptable. I'm not so sure though. To be really honest, you're in danger of being a bit silly about this - it seems to undermine your good faith a little to be playing games in this way. Still, others can make that call. Privatemusings 23:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of the sock puppets? This is silly. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attacks[edit]

Please avoid adding personal attacks, as you did to this edit summary. If you would like more information, please review WP:NPA. Thank You. - Rjd0060 00:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The jerks I refer to were "kneejerks," not people who are jerks, as evidenced by the fact I said "kneejerk" in the comment. MOASPN 00:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that, but the edit summary could still be considered a personal attack by some people, especially since I know you are debating that policy and it seems to be getting heated. - Rjd0060 00:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was funny. -- 146.115.58.152 02:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support[edit]

Have no idea who you are, but you pretty much hit the nail on the head about the ED folks...at least there are some editors who know about their ongoing mischief.--MONGO 03:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

It has been confirmed via checkuser evidence that you are a reincarnation of several previously blocked troll accounts. You have been blocked indefinitely. --krimpet ⟲ 03:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You never replied[edit]

...to my question. I wonder what you think. -GTBacchus^(talk) 07:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]