User talk:Macstringer
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Macstringer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Hamlet. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! WanderingWanda (talk) 09:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi Macstringer! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 19:15, Thursday, January 30, 2020 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Your draft article, Draft:William H Wannamaker
[edit]
Hello, Macstringer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William H Wannamaker".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Roller26 (talk) 11:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The article List of Old Wives Tales has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Many of the items in this list are not Old Wives Tales, but rather are in fact commonly accepted science and practices. Additionally, this page could probably be merged in with its parent article - I don't see a reason to need a split here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 20:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
@WaddlesJP13: Addressing your two concerns: 1. None of the examples listed are science, though you're correct they are still accepted and practiced. 2. This list will get pretty long I think, given the nature of how many old wives tales there are. Macstringer (talk) 20:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Old Wives Tales for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Old Wives Tales until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.