User talk:Magnatyrannus/Archive 10
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Magnatyrannus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
How would you remake WWB Whale Killer??
If you were to remake Walking with Beasts episode, Whale Killer, what setting and animals would you use? CuddleKing1993 (talk) 22:13, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 22:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk: I don't show an interest in Uyghurs. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:32, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- This was with relation to your edits to The Grayzone, which is semi-protected as a topic related to Uyghur genocide broadly construed, and its talk page. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but just because I edit a page doesn't mean that I'm particularly interested in it or the corresponding topic. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 02:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- This was with relation to your edits to The Grayzone, which is semi-protected as a topic related to Uyghur genocide broadly construed, and its talk page. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report about Shiv kumari11 (talk · contribs · block log) at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oh sorry, I reported them because they were making some incorrect edits on the Wikipedia article. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 18:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Dnftt
That means don't post messages on their talk pages, or ping other users to their talk pages. Don't make snarky remarks in your edit summaries or personalize anything. Also the edit was but disruptive enough to meet the threshold for revdel, in my view. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- That means stop all the "begone sock" type stuff. It's not productive. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:14, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Could you please revdel them? I know this might seem excessive, but I feel offended by their remarks. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 02:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)