Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. The sourcery.tcg website is a primary source, as is interviews with the game's creator. Reddit is not an acceptable source either.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sorcery: Contested Realm and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Malimurko!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:43, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sirdog was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
A majority of sources currently present are from blogs or are otherwise not organizations with reputations for fact checking or accuracy. Please review Wikipedia:Notability. Doing a cursory search on Google myself is telling me that this topic simply isn't there yet. Draft submitter is cautioned that continual re-submittance with inadequate sourcing may result in a future reviewer rejecting the draft, which will block further submission. Feel free to reach out to me or at the Wikipedia:Teahouse for help.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sorcery: Contested Realm and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hi! Thanks for taking the time to review the article. It's a shame there's not enough on this topic out there to get accepted by Wikipedia, since the game clearly exists and it's being actively played. Hope it gets covered by more reputable and notable sources in the next 6 months because I wouldn't want this minor work I did to get deleted. Maybe I'll resubmit an edit in a few months. Malimurko (talk) 08:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
