User talk:Mandot

Welcome!

Hello, Mandot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Electro Magnetic Launcher, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 20:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Electro Magnetic Launcher

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 20:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Electro Magnetic Launcher

I have nominated Electro Magnetic Launcher, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electro Magnetic Launcher. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 20:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable reference

You recently added references to World Guide to the Partition of India, to numerous wikipedia pages. Note that such self-published e-books making redflag claims are not considered reliable sources on wikipedia and should not be used as reference or external links. Also, in case you are associated with the author Anadish Kumar Pal, you should be aware of wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines. Abecedare (talk) 02:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Your recent editing history at Gravitational wave shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 10:53, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JohnBlackburne Dr Baker Jr's collaborator's work in HFGW finds a reference in the main article. His site GravWaves has a detailed account of the history and development of GW research. He is a pioneer in the HFGW field, however, this article is not restricted to LFGW; the article is called Gravitational waves. The US patents form an integral part of the technology researched to find applications for HFGW; therefore, they are very relevant for a general reader. The edits which added the links were started months back by another editor and there was no objection by the current editors who were very much observant even then. Now, why this war-like situation? In a Wikipedia article, a general account of the subject is given which includes technology and other educative pages from the internet. GW is a developing field, hence, all possibilities and potentials are to be respected and presented. Please, enlighten me, how taking away technology possibilities of HFGW would enrich the article? My request is to give what I discussed here a thought. Thanks User:Mandot

The best place to discuss this would be the article’s talk page, so other editors watching the page will see any post and can reply.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 11:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]