User talk:Marien

Notability of Valete

A tag has been placed on Valete, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rehnn83 ^Talk 13:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Valete

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Valete, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Rehnn83 ^Talk 14:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In order for your article to be safe from speedy deletion, it needs to assert notability by use of verifiable reliable sources. The Rambling Man 14:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Valete

Hi, you made a great start to the Valete article but it has been requested to be speedily deleted by another user.--Shadyaftrmathgunit 00:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sam the Kid

Could you help me with Sam the Kid's biography section in his article.--Shadyaftrmathgunit 00:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Valete

Response from User talk:MrZaius

If any article uses last.fm in an in-article citation, they are almost certainly in the wrong, as it is in no way a verifiable source. That said, the main reason I struck the external link was that it was non-English and a commercial third party. The one or the other objection might be weak on their own, but together, *shrug* That said, there are some verifiable, published sources discussed in the Articles for Deletion debate that you may be able to translate portions of and use quotes from it to replace the parts of the article that have an unencyclopedic tone, and to remove the blogspot source. MrZaius^talk 17:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also note the comments on Talk:Valete. Should be possible to prevent deletion, given verifiable, published sources and a cleanup for tone. Will gladly withdraw nomination for deletion if WP:NOTE and WP:CITE are met. MrZaius^talk 18:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I'll try my best to follow MrZaius advice. Regardless of whether the article is deleted or not, if you decide to stick around on wikipedia, I'm sure we could certainly use your help on hip hop-related articles. Cheers, Cattus ^talk 18:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Question on Valete

I have replied to you question on my talk page. Cheers. -- Rehnn83 ^Talk 21:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Footmovin' Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Footmovin' Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Footmovin' Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:22, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]