User talk:Mark F Anderton

October 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Drmies (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mark F Anderton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think there must have been some mistake. I don't have any other Wikipedia accounts. Maybe I was misled by the people who told me about these issues and who have perhaps caused trouble on Wikipedia in the past, but I genuinely meant no harm. If I have offended Mr Wales, I apologize. Mark F Anderton (talk) 19:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We both know you're being economical with the actualité. CU confirmed sock. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:45, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mark F Anderton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not hiding anything. After I had been made to wait a few hours, I accepted a request from my sources to know certain details that would allow them to "spoof" my account. They told me they could use this technique to prove I would not get a fair hearing from Wikipedia. Were they correct? Mark F Anderton (talk) 02:51, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even if your ludicrous excuse had any basis in fact, you'd then be remaining very blocked as a compromised account. ~ mazca ^talk 22:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sources? Spoofing your account? What on earth are you talking about? GeneralNotability (talk) 03:13, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]