User talk:Markmillx

November 2017

Hello, I'm Chrissymad. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Asphalt have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chrissy, less of a promotion and more of a alternative which belong in that asphalt section. We're not saying it's the best every asphalt replacement, simply there is an organic alternative and here's the reference. Quite nuetral, objectively written and sourced. I do wish you would reconsider your edit. Markmillx (talk) 18:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)MarkMarkmillx (talk) 18:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Markmillx The sources were all written or published by the company in question, so it is definitely not neutral or reliable. And now looking back, not only is it not a published source, it's just their website. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:18, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Petraviam 2 (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ernestchuajiasheng was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Petraviam 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Petraviam 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 13:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Markmillx, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 13:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Petraviam

Hello, Markmillx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Petraviam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 18:59, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]