User talk:Martha Speaks is more important than Danny Phantom

December 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Reaper Eternal (talk) 04:16, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Martha Speaks is more important than Danny Phantom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK, I've tried many times to get Martha Speaks mentioned on certain list and disambiguation articles. However, those edits kept getting reverted with the stupid, insufficient reason of "not notable". I remember when Helen and Mariela Lorraine had articles - why can't they have them now? Yet, before I added mentions of Martha Speaks in those articles, there were loads of references to Danny Phantom in other articles, such as those on Esperanto and asteroid impacts.

I do not care if Martha Speaks is "not notable". Don't give me that rubbish! It is notable, including all the episodes and characters. Martha Speaks is morally good and has good messages and intentions including English studies, Shakespeare, Spanish, history, and dwarf planets such as Pluto. Endorse good things, forget the notability! Danny Phantom ended long before Martha Speaks was made; everyone likes and cares more about Martha Speaks (which is good) than Danny Phantom. Forget that Hartman darling, Martha Speaks is much better and needs mentions.

If you can't tolerate Martha Speaks on certain pages and dismiss it as "non-notable" then you can't have Danny Phantom either. Martha Speaks is morally better than Danny Phantom and the latter died years ago, get over it. Do not undo my edits; please let Martha Speaks have mentions in other suitable pages including these:

If you add mentions to Martha Speaks on these pages then I'll leave you alone.

If you decline this request, then please leave a long lecture on why. Thank you!

Martha Speaks is more important than Danny Phantom (talk) 04:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The Wikipedia administrator that blocked you did not block you because he had an opinion about the notability of Martha Speaks, but rather because of your behavior; the way in which you went about attempting to prove your point was disruptive in nature: please see Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you find that you are getting reverted on Wikipedia, you should stop and discuss the issue with the editors who disagree with you on Wikipedia talk pages, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution for more information about this process. Additionally, please make sure you disclose all of the accounts that you have previously edited with if you intend to be unblocked—your request indicates that you have previously edited Wikipedia, and keep in mind that it is generally a violation of Wikipedia policy to edit with multiple accounts. Mz7 (talk) 04:41, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.