User talk:Martjoh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello There, Welcome to my wikipedia talk page!!!

Wikipedia Chat[edit]

I am a Chat volunteer helping other people. If you had a good experience with me please write it below and sign it with your name. martjoh (talk) 19:03, 15 January 2013 (UTC) aka fitbobcat[reply]

http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=wikipedia-en-help

January 2013[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for trolling, pretending to be a newbie. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Floquenbeam (talk) 20:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Martjoh (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was not trying to troll. I was signing up to become a reviewer and I made an edit to an article that i thought they had something spelt wrong

Decline reason:

Checkuser shows you have two other accounts, Jmartin008 and Eachieve. Further frivolous requests will result in your talk page access being revoked. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 20:52, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock ME[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Martjoh (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am sorry martjoh (talk) 13:29, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. I would also suggest not threatening to create more socks if you don't get your way, as you did in the unblock-request IRC channel yesterday. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 13:45, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Martjoh, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:51, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]