User talk:Masked333

December 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

firefly ( t · c ) 19:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masked333 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello! I simply cannot understand why I was locked and what specific topic was a concern, I am not involved in any sort of paid editing that I should disclose, I have been contributing to the community being a new user and was learning stuff by making an effort and was blocked out for paid placements reason which I was not doing, Kindly lift the ban so i can continue to contribute to Wikipedia community and understand and learn more about it.Masked333 (talk) 10:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock of User:EuphonyRandolph. We're not going to go through this "I'm not a sock or paid editor" with every one of your confirmed socks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your recent edits are about a Pakistani company and Pakistani actors, two things which often hire people to write about them. How did you select the topics of your edits? 331dot (talk) 13:54, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Nomination of Omni Group of Companies Pakistan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omni Group of Companies Pakistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omni Group of Companies Pakistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HistoriesUnveiler (talk) 11:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nelson Dejesus Vergara

Hello, Masked333. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nelson Dejesus Vergara, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nelson Dejesus Vergara

Hello, Masked333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nelson Dejesus Vergara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]