Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Marco Polo Bridge Incident, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Charles (talk) 13:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
I took the facts from a history book. It was called Common knowledge about Chinese History. I didn't know how to add reference to it so I just edited it like that. Masontao (talk) 03:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Masontao
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Hundred Regiments Offensive. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the . Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 07:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Second Sino-Japanese War
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Marco Polo Bridge Incident. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 16:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Second Sino-Japanese War, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Madsen, Brandt and CV-33 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- I copied it from the National Revolutionary Army article, which I edited before, because the content was very similar but the NRA article had more information. Even before I edited the NRA page, it had disambiguation pages, so my bad. -____- Masontao (talk) 02:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)