User talk:Iamneerajkumaar2003

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your username is a clear violation of Wikipedia's username policy – it is obviously offensive, profane, violent, threatening, sexually explicit, disruptive, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} Hammersoft (talk) 23:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Iamneerajkumaar2003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Iamneerajkumaar2003 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I was in lack of a good catchy username so I decided to use this. I would've never done this if I knew it was considered offensive. --Maximus Dickus 101 (talk) 23:43, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The username issue is now resolved, now we just need to know what edits you wish to make. Please tell us in a new request. 331dot (talk) 08:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you thought using (essentially) the username "Big Dick 101" was a good idea? --Hammersoft (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@-Hammersoft: Ever see Life of Brian? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: Absolutely. Hysterical movie! Love the hermit scene. Regardless, I don't think it's even remotely appropriate for an editor here to use (effectively) the pseudonym "big dick", even if his wife is Incontinentia Buttocks! --Hammersoft (talk) 02:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. I'll be happy to rename com permisso. (Yes, this user name is superlative, but not in a good way. BTW, the adjective should precede the noun. Now, I'm being pedantic.) -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: It's fine with me. I just doubt requisite competence exists, or at least maturity. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft:Too true. @Maximus Dickus 101: Please describe what constructive edits you might make. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]