User talk:Mazaradi F

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from United Football League (2008). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ericdn (talk) 23:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to United Football League (2008), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Please do not delete information unless you can explain why this information should be deleted; this can be done on the article's discussion page. Regarding the logo, it does not apppear to be a poor quality image, so it has been restored. --Ericdn (talk) 23:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to United Football League (2008). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Ericdn (talk) 23:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to United Football League (2008), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Ericdn (talk) 16:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted an external link and provided a new one on the article page. However, the link you provided does not directly replace the deleted link, so I can see no reason to delete it. If there is a reason why it should be deleted, please provide a reason in the edit summary, and also on the article's talk page if necessary. Deleting information without a good reason can be considered censorship. Therefore, I have restored the deleted link while keeping your link: both links are now in the article. This is a more appropriate way to make edits. --Ericdn (talk) 16:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration

I have recommended the article United Football League (2008) for arbitration so that we can solve our deadlock. I invite you visit the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#United_Football_League_.282008.29 in order to view my complaint and add your opinion. Thank you. --Ericdn (talk) 00:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Arbitration problem: :At the very top of the page, just as on any other Wikipedia page, you should see the "Edit" tab. Click on it, and then go to the appropriate place on the page to add your argument. P.S.: Our arbitration request has now been moved further up on the page. Just scroll until you find it. --Ericdn (talk) 00:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're not supposed to put your argument on YOUR user page. Put it on the ARBITRATION page. --Ericdn (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is your account more than 4 days old? If not, you may not be able to edit the page, since it is semi-protected. Anyway, I see that you have put your argument on your user page. It's as good a place as any if you're not able to post it on the arbitration page - they're bound to look there (I hope). --Ericdn (talk) 00:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From my talk page: That would explain your inability to edit. I'll copy and paste for you. --Ericdn (talk) 00:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration declined

Decline - Other steps in dispute resolution have not yet been tried, and this appears to be entirely a content dispute at this point so is outside of the Arbitration Committee's usual scope. Suggest that the parties try a request for comment or third opinion, and perhaps check with the reliable sources noticeboard for advice as well. Risker (talk) 00:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

So, I suppose it's a moot point to copy your arbitration argument to the page as you asked me to, as our request has been denied. I think it's safe to remove it from your userpage now. There are other ways to decide this issue, but I have decided to wash my hands of this whole issue. I will no longer be involved with that page. Do what you want, good luck, and if anyone else has any objections, feel free to take it up with them. --Ericdn (talk) 00:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to United Football League (2008). If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 02:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jeremy Bleich

The article Jeremy Bleich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable minor league baseball player

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spanneraol (talk) 18:27, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]