User talk:Mensanamonographs

Welcome!

Hello, Mensanamonographs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

You are welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but please don't use it for advertising. Blatant advertisements will be deleted. Gazpacho 05:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested to read What Wikipedia Is Not - specifically, it is not the place for posting of journal articles, and especially not for promoting commercial products. Some of the articles you created are eligible for deletion under Wikipedia's Criteria for Speedy Deletion, and may be deleted shortly. If you have any questions, you can contact me on my talk page. Cheers. --P e ruvianLlama^(spit) 05:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mens Sana Research Foundation has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Hello Mensanamonographs. An article that you created, Mens Sana Research Foundation, has been nominated for deletion. If you think that the article is salvageable, please join in the discussion . Please see Wikipedia:Guide_to_deletion if you have any questions about Wikipedia's deletion process. EdJohnston 18:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mens Sana Monographs[edit]

I have reverted your changes to Mens Sana Monographs because you primarily removed {{bias}} and {{primarysources}}. These tags should not be removed without being properly addressed. In order to assist in those tags being removed, it is very important that you read "Neutral Point of View" and "Reliable Sources". The first task you can help with is to find "third party" web or print resources that mention this topic. Also, it appears that you have a conflict of interest with this article; please read WP:COI to understand why you need to be especially careful editing. John Vandenberg 10:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Ajai R. Singh[edit]

I have removed the proposed deletion from this article because I think the subject is notable. Other editors have expressed the opinion that this article is autobiographical, that is that you, Mensanamonographs, are Dr Singh. If that is so you should review the guidlines re autobio. Perhaps you can find someone else to rewrite this using the guidelines for biographies of living people. Thnx -killing sparrows 00:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re Ajai R Singh[edit]

And I have just replaced the proposed deletion since I believe that from the information in the article, the subject is not notable enough for inclusion, and the article appears autobiographical. It has been CSD'd as A7 (Non notable Bio or article which does not stress the notability of the subject). Thor Malmjursson 21:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Swara Sampada[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Swara Sampada, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swara Sampada. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 16:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Mensanamonographs! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 936 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Shakuntala Singh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 04:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shakuntala Singh for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shakuntala Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakuntala Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 04:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]