User talk:Meowsaysthomascat

September 2015

Hello, I'm Inomyabcs. An edit you recently made to Thorny dragon seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Inomyabcs (talk) 04:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paloma nicholls

Hello Meowsaysthomascat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Paloma nicholls for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ita140188 (talk) 04:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thorny dragon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thorny dragon was changed by Meowsaysthomascat (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962666 on 2015-09-21T05:23:11+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Thorny dragon

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Thorny dragon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! APerson (talk!) 02:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paloma Nicholls

A tag has been placed on Paloma Nicholls, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 23:49, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HighInBC 23:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]