User talk:Merlin 1971

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Merlin 1971! Thank you for your contributions. I am Kikichugirl and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! kikichugirl (talk) 19:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

Please use secondary sources per WP:MEDRS. The lead is to be a summary of the body of the text. Thus restored the conclusions of recent review articles to the lead. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 06:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. If a paper is published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, it is classified as science! WP:MEDRS does not belong to the ecig-article, beause e-cigs are not a cure oder medicine! 2. WP:SCHOLARSHIP : Wikipedia articles rely on scholarly material. When available, academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly monographs, and textbooks are usually the most reliable sources.--Merlin 1971 (talk) 13:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Admins

If you ever have any issues that need a sane admin I've found User:John to be very good, although obviously I'm not suggesting anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.201.62.214 (talk) 21:58, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the hint!--Merlin 1971 (talk) 13:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This might interest you too: QuackGuru has attracted complaints before and been topic banned from various things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.201.62.214 (talk) 20:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"They carry a risk of addiction to tobacco in those who do not already smoke" WTF? No they don't!

Yes I know - But the WHO states, that e-cigarettes carry a risk of addiction....--Merlin 1971 (talk) 21:37, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In a FAQ, not a secondary source. The idea that vapes lead to smoking tobacco is wrong and we DON'T want that in the article lead. It's better for it to say nicotine addiction even though that's rubbish too.--37.201.62.214 (talk) 22:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The missing source is quite interesting, isn't it? The problem is: There is no such thing as "nicotine addiction" and you can not mess with the WHO.--Merlin 1971 (talk) 22:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

For not losing temper, giving reasoned explanations, and not going into a rant when things get hot at Electronic cigarette, for future cooperation, i give you this kitten, since it is such a nice calming influence :)

Kim D. Petersen 00:27, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 3 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Nicotine poisoning page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BMJ

Please fill out this very short form to receive your free access to BMJ's library: link to form. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 03:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you!--Merlin 1971 (talk) 18:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Do you have an email somewhere, or skype, etc...?Jonny Quick (talk) 00:31, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]