User talk:Michael Cohen
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Michael Cohen, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Onorem 11:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Your edit to Diamond grading
[edit]Message posted on Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Diamond grading. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://dcla.com.au/4C_about.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Diamond grading with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Diamond grading with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Diamond grading saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.
It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Your original contributions are welcome. --Onorem 11:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- The Diamond Certification Laboratory of Australia article has also been tagged as having copyvio problems. --Onorem 11:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
The material belongs to me I am a director at the DCLA
[edit]Message posted on Tuesday, April 24, 2007
[edit] Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to DCLA. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.dcla.com.au/ in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:DCLA with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:DCLA with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:DCLA saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.
It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Your original contributions are welcome.
Butseriouslyfolks 02:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
The material belongs to me I am a director at the DCLA
[edit]Your edit to Diamond Certification Laboratory of Australia
[edit]Message posted on Tuesday, April 24, 2007
[edit] Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Diamond Certification Laboratory of Australia. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://dcla.com.au/ in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Diamond Certification Laboratory of Australia with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Diamond Certification Laboratory of Australia with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Diamond Certification Laboratory of Australia saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.
It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Your original contributions are welcome.
Butseriouslyfolks 02:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
The material belongs to me I am a director at the DCLA I am not quite sure what I am doing wrong
[edit]DCLA
[edit]Hi, I saw your message on my talk page. There are a few policies you need to be aware of. First is Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. In a nutshell, editors are very strongly discouraged from creating or editing articles about themselves and other subjects close to them, such as their businesses. If your lab is sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will write an article about it eventually.
Second, in order to post text copied from elsewhere, you have to both demonstrate that you are the owner and release the text under the GFDL. This means that others can edit it without limits. You cannot control the text once it released or the article once it is posted. If you want to do this, the easiest way is to include a notice on your lab's website that the contents of the website are licensed pursuant to the GNU Free Documentation License. If you then use that text in an article, you should note on the article's talk page that the use is permitted and give a link to the notice on the website.
Finally, anytime you add a comment to an article talk page or user talk page, you should be sure to sign your name by using four tildes (~~~~). This will create a link that people can use to get to your user and user talk pages, and it will also timestamp your comment.
Good luck, and let me know if you have any further questions.
--Butseriouslyfolks 05:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for you help
[edit]Thanks for you help, I think I am getting the Idea (--Michael Cohen 07:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC))
Clarification
[edit]You should use the tildes (~~~~) to sign your comments only on talk pages, not in the articles themselves. Contributions to articles don't get signed. Thanks. --Butseriouslyfolks 08:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Butseriouslyfolks I need a little help,I am realy getting into this --Michael Cohen 09:05, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Duplicate images uploaded
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Dcla cibjocert.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Cibjocert.jpg. The copy called Image:Cibjocert.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:DCLA cibjocert.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:DCLA cibjocert.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
My entire contribution was deleted WHY???????--[[
User:Michael Cohen|Michael Cohen]] 21:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Do not blank this page
[edit]Please do not remove current warnings from a talk page: it serves as a record for any future action. Thank you for your cooperation. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 22:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Answer my Question?Why was my work removed?????????--Michael Cohen 10:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I have resubmitted the page in the new format I hope that this is correct if not I hope someone else will take up the challenge.--Michael Cohen 01:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- (Cross-posted to article talk) It's not a matter of resubmitting the content in a new format, and I would have hoped that after it had been deleted four different times this would have dawned upon you. The article has and has continued to violate a number of manual of style issues, and this is not withstanding that the entity as documented does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for companies and organisations. The article has in all iterations been poorly written, lacks reliable sources, smells of original research, and because you are a private company none of the information is verifiable. If you can demonstrate otherwise to a manner that meets Wikipedia's criteria, I would strongly encourage you to participate in the current AfD discussion. Otherwise, it would be better for you to simply accept that you have a conflict of interest and not create articles of this nature. Thewinchester (talk) 01:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
All I can say is delete it,I have tried to be part of this site a contribute to it.But it is obviously not meant to be.