User talk:Mikester Pro
MfD nomination of User:Mikester Pro
[edit]User:Mikester Pro, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mikester Pro and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mikester Pro during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Repost of User:Mikester Pro
[edit]
A tag has been placed on User:Mikester Pro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 
which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:31, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Mikester Pro, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Please note that user pages are for editors to tell us a bit about themselves. They are not for fantasies such as a report of the 2026 World Cup. If you have a time machine, please note that this would count as original research WP:OR as the WP:RS sources would be unavailable to the rest of us. If you don't have the use of one, then this counts as a hoax. Peridon (talk) 16:00, 11 November 2014 (UTC)