User talk:Mohammadharandi
Citing sources
[edit]Hello. I think you're trying to add footnotes to sources that support the text immediately before them, but that isn't what's happening. Instead, you're just inserting raw web addresses in the text with no explanation. Please see WP:Citing sources. Largoplazo (talk) 07:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Functional food, you may be blocked from editing. ... and on several other articles. The source you have been adding has little relevance to the articles, and is improperly formatted, WP:REFB. Zefr (talk) 15:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 17:30, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nilzzz7 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nilzzz7. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. RoySmith (talk) 00:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.