User talk:Moktrsalem12

September 2021[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mauritania, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Meters (talk) 20:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Lalla Mariam Bint Moulaye Idriss, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:21, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with your edits[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Many of your edits are incorrect and have had to be reverted:

Do not change birth or death dates without providing a source
Years should not be linked
"government", "capital", "embassay" do not need to be capitalised
Please to not put quotation marks around things that are not quotes
Date formats should match those used elsewhere in the article (for instance, if an article already uses the format "30 August 2017", you should not add a date in the format "December 12 1984"
Do not change sourced figures as you did at Mauritanians in Senegal where you changed 70,000 (a figure sourced to the Stone book) to 40,000.
At the star of introductions, 'The' should not normally be bolded.
There is no space between a word and a colon (:)

In a few cases I noticed that you also changed correct figures for election results to incorrect ones (e.g. here and here. Therefore, I am planning on blocking you from editing as I am concerned you may be here to cause problems. Please explain why you changed the results to the incorrect figures. Number 5 7 12:33, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you've continued wrongly changing sourced material (the source states that the defendants were only given access to a lawyer on the day of their trial) and using false edit summaries, you are now blocked. You may request an unblock, but will need to explain why you inserted incorrect information and continued with the other problematic edits. Number 5 7 21:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.