User talk:MollieSummers

Welcome!

Hello, MollieSummers, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hyper Agency, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WWGB (talk) 11:47, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hyper Agency

The article Hyper Agency has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent references, unable to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 11:47, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hyper Agency for deletion

The article Hyper Agency is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyper Agency until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WWGB (talk) 12:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Comedy Dave do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jonobennett (talk) 15:37, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your links

Hi. Thank you for your recent additions, but I'm afraid what you've been adding is inappropriate for Wikipedia. The problem with the links you have been adding to articles is two-fold;

Firstly, Wikipedia is not a internet directory. The purpose of External Link sections is not to provide a list of links to where the subject of the article may appear on the internet.
Secondly, what you are linking to doesn't supply anything new to the article. All it demonstrates is that these people are represented by this agency. The blurb written up on the linked page doesn't say anything that either isn't already in the article, or couldn't be added to the article. Links should be limited to ones that link to material that can't be included in the article, for reasons of copyright, for instance. I don't see anything in your links that do this really.

Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 21:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]