User talk:Momo857

Welcome!

Hi Momo857! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 04:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoomex (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Cryptoblogs are not reliable. References must meet WP:ORGCRIT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zoomex and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 04:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Momo857! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 04:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thank you for your comment. While editing the article, I also encountered the concern you raised in your comment. I decided to research other entities within the same industry, and I discovered that they also face similar issues with citation sources, such as cryptoblogs or other media channels. This situation has left me puzzled about the WP:ORGCRIT guidelines and how they apply in this context. Momo857 (talk) 05:23, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WHATABOUTX should help clear up any confusion. The existence of issues in other pages does not mean that we create new pages on other topics with similar issues. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:26, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zoomex

Hello, Momo857. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zoomex".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 11:26, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]