User talk:Mondalor

Bot

Hi, as in this edit, why does your bot move stub templates up above the categories? I thought they were supposed to go after the categories, so that the stub category comes at the end of the category list.--Kotniski (talk) 14:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Kotniski! There is no principled difference, where to put the templates. I randomly looked up some articles, where my bot is not to move the templates (for example). You can see that the templates (in this case - {{Lifetime | 1987 | | Granero, Esteban}}) are at the start of the category list. Consequently, the bot is working correctly. Best regards, Mondalor (talk) 18:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stubs, spaces

Stubs go after categories as in this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grundloser_See&diff=prev&oldid=297117506. This is long standing practice - partly to put hte stub category at the end.

Spaces in titles are optional, currently (3 November) the distribution is:

Spaces in header 3,571,002.
No spaces in header 9,967,810.

Seeming to imply that editors prefer not to have them.

Best regards, Rich Farmbrough, 14:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

I do not see any bugs in this edit, sorry. Bot simply changed interwiki (without cosmetic changes). Now about the templates. Any template (whether stub-templates) should be placed after the list of categories, before interwiki links. None of what the established practice, at least here, on English Wikipedia, I do not know (by the way, can you give me a link to the appropriate thread?)

In other words, you are wrong. Bot uses a completely standard script (I myself did not invent it). If there are any claims - please write to developers. Mondalor (talk) 17:39, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the example is a diff from your bot application. You have added the expression "cosmetic changes" The edits from 18th June do not have this edit summary, many later ones do. Are you using pywikipedia? Here (Wikipedia:Stub#How_to_mark_an_article_as_a_stub) is the stub guideline. Thanks Rich Farmbrough, 00:02, 21 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

    def cleanUpSectionHeaders(self, text):
        """
        For better readability of section header source code, puts a space
        between the equal signs and the title.
        Example: ==Section title== becomes == Section title ==

        NOTE: This space is recommended in the syntax help on the English and
        German Wikipedia. It might be that it is not wanted on other wikis.
        If there are any complaints, please file a bug report.
        """
        for level in range(1, 7):
            equals = '=' * level
            text = pywikibot.replaceExcept(text, r'\n' + equals + ' *(?P<title>[^=]+?) *' + equals + ' *\r\n', '\n' + equals + ' \g<title> ' + equals + '\r\n', ['comment', 'math', 'nowiki', 'pre'])
        return text

This is wrong. It is not recommended on the English Wiki. Please file a bug report. It is from cosmetic.py not interwiki.py. Rich Farmbrough, 00:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

I have filed a bug report here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2901691&group_id=93107&atid=603138. Rich Farmbrough, 11:00, 21 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Ok, thank you. Let's wait for a response to the request to the developers. Mondalor (talk) 12:39, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The bug is Not fixed because there is no response from the developers. Mondalor (talk) 07:55, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Objection to bot edit

I object to this edit in the most strenuous terms. Removing en dash entities makes it harder for other, human, editors to figure out whether the article has been formatted properly or not (hyphen or en dash). I would shout this objection from the highest skyscraper, were there one close by. —Aladdin Sane (talk) 18:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I do not share your point of view. If the bot encounters in article's code &ndash, it replaces it on a hyphen. If the bot encounters in the code &mdash, it replaces it on a dash. Thus, the bot only simplifies the code of the page. It does not affect the appearance of the page (and technically cannot affect). This bug is

Not fixed. Thanks, best regards, Mondalor (talk) 07:51, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I must reply. The entities are not for readers. They are for human editors, like me, who go through, character by character, and ensure that MOS standards are being applied correctly. What we humans do must take precedence over what computerized bots do, and it makes my job much harder as an editor, if I have to download a page and hex edit it to find out which character was used: I cannot tell by eyesight, and I'm informed I'm not the only human editor who can't tell. As far as I can tell (except my common sense tells me otherwise), the bot replaced the entities with hyphens, not en dashes. Now, next time I review the article, I will have to put all the en dash entities back in (by hand, as I did the first time), to assure myself and others, as editors, that the correct characters are being output for the reader. And yes, the next time I review the article I will, by hand, check every last error I can find in it.

The bot is making life harder, not easier, for those of us that care about accuracy of output. The idea of "we don't care about human editors because we have bots" is fundamentally antithetical to Wikipedia Principle #3 as elucidated at User:Jimbo_Wales. The word is "you", as in human being, not bot. We humans, not bots, make the encyclopedia work. The second the bots start interfering with my human capabilities to edit the thing, they should all be thrown out: It's a threshold argument I wish you would consider.

The fact that most editors use hyphens when they write at a keyboard is natural, and expected. When I go looking for mistakes that apply to GA or FA, in order to raise an articles quality, I have to know if I'm looking at a mistake, or a proper character to be output. I simply can't tell unless the entity is spelled out. I don't expect editors who write the text to have these details down; I don't do it myself when I write text; I expect to simply fix it when I'm mood to spot these things, and move on. The bot makes me have to go in circles, and takes all the interest out of editing. Since I can't tell by eyesight whether the right or wrong character is used, I will have to give up on correcting these mistakes, and let the whole encyclopedia go to hyphens. No article will make FA then; it's about caring for the article as such.

Recently, an editor used a script to change the en dash entities in the MOS document itself to characters. He was reverted so fast it made my head spin. He promised to never, ever do it again. —Aladdin Sane (talk) 10:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MondalorBot 2

I have marked this BRfA as withdrawn per your request. Thank you none the less for offering the services of your bot. Please feel free to reopen it at any time. I hope you keep up it's useful interwiki linking - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 13:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Stories Project

Hi!

My name is Victor and I'm a storyteller with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. I'm chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who make and use Wikipedia have so much to share.

I'm scouring user pages looking for inspiring, motivating and interesting stories of how Wikipedia has affected the lives of people. I'm asking questions like "How has Wikipedia changed your life?", "What's the most interesting story you have about Wikipedia?" and "Has Wikipedia ever surprised you?"

Last year, we used the annual fundraiser as a way to show the world who it is who actually writes Wikipedia. We featured editors from Brazil, Ukraine, Argentina, Saudi Arabia, Kenya, India, United States and England. This campaign was a huge success, resulting in the most financially successful fundraising campaign ever. It was also a campaign that stayed true to the spirit of Wikipedia, educating the public that this free top-5 website is created by volunteers like you and I.

This year we want to highlight more Russian-language Wikipedia editors, so I am in the process of planning a trip to Russia to interview editors.

If you or someone you know (or have heard about) has been positively affected by Wikipedia, or have something interesting to say about Wikipedia I'd very much like to hear about it!

Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project, or if you know someone else with whom I should speak.

Of course, if you have any questions or concerns, please ask! I will answer as soon as I can. I apologize for any poor translation of this letter, I am using Google-translate. I hope it makes you laugh :)

Thank you for your time,

Victor Grigas

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

__________________________________

Привет!

Меня зовут Виктор, и я рассказчик с Wikimedia Foundation, некоммерческая организация, которая поддерживает Википедию. Я хроник вдохновляющих историй сообщества Википедии по всему миру, в том числе и читателей, редакторов и доноров. Истории совершенно необходимы для любой некоммерческой органицации, чтобы убедить людей поддержывать наш проект, и мы знаем, что у людей, которые строют и используют Википедии есть много, что рассказать!

Я ищу вдохновляющие страницы пользователей, и интересных историй о том, как Википедия влияют на жизнь людей. Я задавал вопросы вроде "Как Википедия изменила Вашу жизнь?", "Какая самая интересная история у Вас есть о Википедии?" и "Википедия ли когда-нибудь Вас удивило?"

В прошлом году мы использовали ежегодный сбор средств как способ показать миру, кто на самом деле пишет Википедия. Мы показывали редакторов из Бразилии, Украины, Аргентины, Саудовской Аравии, Кении, Индии, США и Англии. Этот метод имел огромный успех, в результате чего у нас была наиболее финансово успешная кампании по сбору средств в историе организации. Кроме того, мы остались верны духу Википедии, просвещение общественности, что это бесплатно ТОП-5 Сайт создан добровольцами, как Ви и я.

В этом году мы хотим выделить еще редакторов Википедии на русском языке, так что я нахожусь в процессе планирования поездки в Россию и интервью с редакторами.

Если Википедия положительно повлеяла на Вас или на кого-то из Ваших знакомых, или у Вас есть что-то интересное сказать о Википедии, я бы очень хотел услышать об этом!

Пожалуйста, дайте мне знать, если Ви бы хотели участвовать в проекте Истории Википедии, или если вы знаете кого-то еще, с кем я должен поговорить.

Конечно, если у Вас есть какие-либо вопросы или сомнения, пожалуйста, обращайтесь! Я отвечу, как только смогу. Извините за плохой перевод этого письма, я использую Google-перевод. Я надеюсь, что заставляет вас смеяться :)

Спасибо за Ваше время,

Victor Grigas

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 00:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]