Jump to content

User talk:Moonandback

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Moonandback, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dkriegls (talk to me!) 09:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

I reverted a recent edit of yours on the Behavioral Medicine article (seen here). I am fairly sure that it should be singular, since all uses of the term in the book need not be referenced. Only the first use of the term 'Behavioral medicine'. But I am open to critique. --Dkriegls (talk to me!) 02:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My reasoning was that the term was introduced independently and more or less simultaneously in a book title and two academic clinical programs. I originally used the singular but then decided the plural more accurately stated the case. I think it could be argued both ways but will leave the passage as you have revised it. Moonandback (talk) 07:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Well that makes sense. Is there no way of determining which was published first? Why give credit to both the book and the papers? If not, I agree that it should be plural. Dkriegls (talk to me!) 08:20, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that it would be possible to determine the exact historical priority. Even if it were, doing full justice to the issue would also require an investigation of the extent to which early uses of the term was consistent with the way the field evolved, which strikes me as beyond the scope of this article. The point I was trying to make is that these independent early uses suggest that the term captured ideas that were in the air at the time, foreshadowing a more extensive development the concept in the later 1970s. I have recast the passage in a way that I hope makes this clearer. Moonandback (talk) 19:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Moonandback, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Hi Moonandback! Thanks for writing. When you modified the article, you took out the Articles for Creation template, so you're right, the "Resubmit" button disappeared. I've added it back. Don't worry, when the article is approved, that template is automatically removed, so you don't have to do it yourself. Hope that helps! 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 03:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! Moonandback (talk) 07:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Teahouse talkback

[edit]
Hello, Moonandback. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ~ Anastasia (talk) 22:13, 7 May 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. — kikichugirl speak up! 08:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moonandback. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]