User talk:MrBula

Belated welcomes

Hello, Mark. Been here so many months and nobody welcomed you? Yeah, well, when you work for a 9-billion-dollar-a-year-earner what do you expect? (At least Brookers is small enough for the boss to be on first-name terms with more than half the staff, and new staff nearly always get a brief mention in the daily "Staff Whereabouts" sent out by Reception at about 9.30.)

Good to see another Wikipedian taking a serious interest in The Thomson Corporation. I plan to take that naming question a little further one day.

Keep smiling! Robin Patterson 05:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mark, there's a question whether Mills Corp owns ANYTHANG now, better to leave it blank. Please update yourself on the Mills Corp. May 12, 2007

Fair use rationale for Image:Thomson Reuters logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Thomson Reuters logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of FindLaw

The article FindLaw has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The only source given is an interview, arguably for PR purposes, and most other coverage I could find was insignificant or not at reliable, independent sources. There is insufficient evidence to show that the company meets the notability guidelines for companies or the general notability guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 18:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FindLaw for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article FindLaw, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 07:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]