User talk:N00BST3R

Sockpuppet?

– Athaenara ✉ 16:06, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Cleaned up

Stop removing them. This article was created by someone who directly admitted to being his manager. That's a major and obvious conflict of interest. And it reads like a promotional bio, not an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not part of an artists promotional campaign. It's not another leg of his social media campaign. It's a neutral encyclopedia. As long as this reads like a resume, the tags need to remain. (And that's if it's not deleted again like last time.) Sergecross73 msg me 00:58, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

i actually saw thisisepicteps post on reddit when i was scrolling thru stuff saying that wikipedia was trying to suppress an acitvists wiki so i looked into it. i created an account and verified all the links and everything is legit. this stuff all checks out. im pretty sure thisisepicstep is just some super fan trying to pretend they are close with the artist to look good. looks like the artist doesnt have a manager, he manages himself and and all contact seems to go direcly to him not to a managment according to his website. thisisepicstep claimed to be some guy form rumbum records, but nowhere at all online ever in history does rumbum ever mention the siren. so obviously thisisepicstep was lying about being a manager hahaha. prob a super fan or a guy at that label that is a super fan that was interested in the artist or follows their career from the outside like a fan. super fans are creepy. but, we thank them for their contribution. they brought facts about an artist to the realm. as far as the content listed, its the same stuff you would find looking at other big artists that won awards. they always list what years they won what. thats expected. seems normal to me. i just came to make sure wiki wasnt suppressing an activist. i could care less about the music. this artist def was on national news and performed at the 2016 3rd party presidential debates in colorado i found out too. oh i should add that link reference and update their wiki. thats important. N00BST3R (talk) 02:04, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

"Superfan pretending to be a manager" is not a common scenario I've encountered on Wikipedia. "Manager writing promotional content for their client" is one that is attempted all the time. There's a reasonable suspicion here, and that's all it takes to warrant the template, so do not remove it anymore. Sergecross73 msg me 02:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

ok i wont mess with it anymore. but i did personally look into everything written and its all historic facts none the less. whether they are a fan, or directly linked, there is no evidence of that, so thats all irrelevent since its not able to be proved. what matters are the facts. take careN00BST3R (talk) 02:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

User:Sergecross73 wow someone against the 3rd party political spectrum or that hates an activist that was on Russia Today News really is trying to suppress this activist! the entire page was deleted! 100% factual, i cehcked all the links myself! i am going to tweet about this and reddit about it right now for everyone to keep posting it and screen cap it if it gets deleted. IM BLOWING THIS UP. i knew something fishy was going on. im calling on everyone to create wiki accounts and copy and paste the info from the editing page i saved. unbelievable. this happened to Abby Martin of RT News also! if something is factual, it needs to be on wiki. BLOWIN THIS UP. get ready for lots of people on twitter and reddit creating accounts and posting about this suppression and making sure it doesnt happen! i cant stand corruption N00BST3R (talk) 02:53, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

It's hard to follow what exactly you're talking about, but if you're still talking about "The Siren", the article was deleted by a separate admin for being overtly promotion and not adhering to policy. No corruption at all. Sergecross73 msg me 14:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)