User talk:NHS Editor

Hello, and thanks for your contribution Central london community healthcare nhs trust. However, I notice that its text is very similar to that of http://www.clch.nhs.uk/about/index.html .

Unfortunately, Wikipedia's policies regard this as a potential violation of the original site's copyright, unless you can prove that you are authorized to release this text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.

If you can do the latter, please contact WP:OTRS to let them know. Otherwise, could you please write a new version of the article, in your own words? -- The Anome (talk) 14:37, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Central london community healthcare nhs trust

A tag has been placed on Central london community healthcare nhs trust, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (NHS Editor) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to represent a group, organization, or web site, rather than an individual. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 14:53, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, NHS Editor, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:53, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]